Performance-based funding (PBF), which links state appropriations for public colleges to student outcomes, continues to be adopted and used despite evidence that it does not improve student outcomes. A primary argument for adoption is that states can leverage PBF to expand accountability when increasing funds to public colleges. But we know little regarding whether PBF is associated with measurable changes in state appropriations. Drawing on up-to-date PBF data, we ask: To what extent does PBF adoption increase state appropriations for public colleges? We do not find consistent evidence that PBF increases state appropriations to public four-year or community colleges. Although PBF is sometimes used to argue for increased state funding, this brief demonstrates these funds do not consistently materialize.
Read MoreIn this brief, we examined how state-level financial aid policies relate to students’ enrollment and completion using detailed data on states’ financial aid programs available for first-time entering college students for fiscal years 2004-2020. We found little consistent evidence of a relationship between student outcomes and the amount of aid per recipient, though, we did find practically significant correlations with aid eligibility criteria. Among institutions located in states with aid disbursed based on financial need and academic merit, requiring a college entrance exam for eligibility was associated with smaller enrollments and lower graduation rates compared to institutions that did not require the exams. This finding was not replicated when we explored requiring exams for institutions in states with aid disbursed solely based on academic merit.
Read More